I’m like the César Chávez of Blogging

I rarely drink soda but when I do I expect to be compensated for it. I mean I’m sort of a big deal on the internet being a famous blogger and all. Can I seriously be expected to give out prime real-estate on my site with some crazy free product placement deal?

Not long ago, as my most recent soda shakes began to take hold, I decided to do what any right-minded capitalistic American would do. I called up my agent and told him to get me some sort of big time blogger/soda endorsement deal before I came down to his office and told him stories about the Ancient Aztecs used to rip off the heads of their fallen enemy and shit in their skull before using the head itself, now filled with poop, in some ancient form of basketball.

Since I live in NYC and I’m a Yankees fan it seemed natural that we set our sights on PepsiCo. Besides, their worldwide headquarters is just north of the city in White Plains which meant, travel-wise, I could literally do as little as possible to try and seal this deal.

Once my agent got us the meeting we hopped on the Metro North to White Plains and got ready to do battle with these guys. I have to admit that there were a few points during the negotiations that got pretty ugly. There was a lot of name-calling and a lot of, “are you fucking serious, do you really think there’s any goddamned chance in hell that we would even consider giving you money just for sitting around drinking a Pepsi while you blag or blark or whatever the fuck you call it then you’re out of your god damned mind,” or something to that effect.
[Read more...]

What AT&T’s ‘Rethink Possible’ Ad Should Say

Talk about truth in advertising.

AT&T Rethink Possible

Via robhue.

Evangeline Lilly Does Steamy Phone Sex Ads, Wants to Know What You’re Wearing Fatty

Yes, I know this isn’t the freshest news but lest we forget where Kate got her start let’s take a look at Evangeline Lilly’s acting experience before she was cast in Lost. The only thing that would possibly make this thing better would be to find out that Live Links was a subsidiary of the DHARMA Initiative.

Video #2 | Video #3

Google Reverses Course, Allows Trademarked Adwords to be Bought by (Most) Everyone

Google AdWords LogoGoogle has announced a change in its AdWords policy that is sure to do two things. It’s sure to make a lot of people a more money, and it’s sure to stir up a quite a bit of controversy. Last Thursday, Google announced on its AdWord blog that it was reversing its previous stance and would begin allowing certain companies to purchase AdWords containing trademarks that they did not own.

…in an effort to improve ad quality and user experience, we are adjusting our trademark policy in the U.S. to allow some ads to use trademarks in the ad text. This change will bring Google’s policy on trademark use in ad text more in line with the industry standard. Under certain criteria, you can use trademark terms in your ad text in the U.S. even if you don’t own that trademark or have explicit approval from the trademark owner to use it. This change will help you to create more narrowly targeted ad text that highlights your specific inventory.

For example, under our old policy, a site that sells several brands of athletic shoes may not have been able to highlight the actual brands that they sell in their ad text. However, under our new policy, that advertiser can create specific ads for each of the brands that they sell. We believe that this change will help both our users and advertisers by reducing the number of overly generic ads that appear across our networks in the U.S.

I’m not exactly sure what Google’s stance was before because it is already being sued for selling trademarked brands without permission, not to mention the suits they’ve settled out of court.

On Monday, FPX filed a class-action suit against Google in federal court in Texas, saying that Google had infringed on its trademark and challenging Google’s policies on behalf of all trademark owners in the state. Legal experts said it was the first class-action suit against Google over the issue.

But Google’s acceptance of such competitive uses of trademarks has irked many other companies, including the likes of American Airlines and Geico, which have filed suits against Google and settled them. Many brand owners say the practice abuses their brands, confuses customers and increases their cost of doing business.

Only time will tell whether or not this move by Google will make things better or worse.

AT&T teaching new gradu8s how 2 spell

One of my pet peeves are people who use numbers and letters among other things to compose text messages or, even worse, emails and facebook messages. Of course at&t isn’t worried about any of that. They just know it’s hip and edgy to be illiterate…especially if you just graduated from something or other.

gmail-exclusively-from-att-buy-one-lg-xenon-get-one-free-jamespolinggmailcom_1242400418982

TiVo Revs Up Spam on its Machines, Keeps Driving the Nails in Its Own Coffin

tivo-pause-adJust when you thought you couldn’t get any more annoyed by TiVo’s plastering of ads on virtually every part of your screen, just when you thought there was no more real estate left to bombard you with crappy spam the hammer drops.

Hope you don’t like to use the “pause” feature.

Using the TiVo Pause Menu, advertisers can, for the first time, reach audiences with targeted product messages displayed within the pause screen of a Live or Timeshifted program. The feature provides an original solution for advertisers seeking to capture the fast-forwarding viewer. It’s another example of how TiVo offers unique and different solutions for advertisers looking to get viewers to watch advertisements.

What with TiVo hemorrhaging subscribers like they had the plague, you’d think they would be a little more concerned with their customer’s user experience.  It’s hard to tell which came first though, the chicken or the egg.  Are the ads to replace lost subscribers or did subscribers leave because the ads were so fucking annoying.

TiVo released its third quarter results today, and while the company reported a profit (thank you, EchoStar for that $105 million patent violation payment) the DVR maker lost 163,000 subscribers, dragging its total number of subscribers down to 3.46 million — the lowest it’s been since the spring of 2005.

tivo_logo_manTiVo’s DVRs sell for $149.99 to $599.99  and after you buy a box you have to shell out $13 more every month just for the service, that’s all on top of whatever your normal cable bill is.

Imagine paying good money for a nice watch and then every time you checked to see what time it was the background of your watch was an ad for shaving cream or your local chiropractor.  It would feel pretty shitty wouldn’t it?

Cable company DVRs do exactly the same thing as a TiVo with low monthly costs for the box and a much lower monthly rate for the service, not to mention they don’t spam your screen real estate with ads everywhere.

I have for quite a while been contemplating getting a TiVo to replace my cable company’s DVR.  This information makes it much easier to stay with what I got.  Now instead of a TiVo my next investment will be a BluRay player.