<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Inglorious Rise and Fall of Movable Type: Now making products for WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m not a businessman. I&#039;m a business, man.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:30:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamespoling.com/?p=1878#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to comment Brad. I personally haven&#039;t found anything that I can do with MT that I can&#039;t do with WP. Have you ever worked with WPMU? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that I&#039;m trying to talk you out of anything, obviously people are going to use whatever best suits their needs. I do find it interesting you use both though. It seems you usually find people who are on one side of the fence or the other. Sometimes it&#039;s best to be on the fence...you get a better view :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment Brad. I personally haven&#39;t found anything that I can do with MT that I can&#39;t do with WP. Have you ever worked with WPMU? </p>
<p>Not that I&#39;m trying to talk you out of anything, obviously people are going to use whatever best suits their needs. I do find it interesting you use both though. It seems you usually find people who are on one side of the fence or the other. Sometimes it&#39;s best to be on the fence&#8230;you get a better view <img src='http://jamespoling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Bell</title>
		<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamespoling.com/?p=1878#comment-362</guid>
		<description>The latest versions of Movable Type (MT4) and Wordpress (WP2.8) are amazing. Both new versions are huge leaps forward. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While they are similar in many respects, the new rockin&#039; versions make it seem increasingly odd to consider them as competitors. Wordpress is best for single blogs. Movable Type is better if you want a lightweight CMS; if you want a bigger multi-blog site, or a hybrid site with a more open ended structure. I can&#039;t really use one tool in place of the other. I use both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest versions of Movable Type (MT4) and Wordpress (WP2.8) are amazing. Both new versions are huge leaps forward. </p>
<p>While they are similar in many respects, the new rockin&#39; versions make it seem increasingly odd to consider them as competitors. Wordpress is best for single blogs. Movable Type is better if you want a lightweight CMS; if you want a bigger multi-blog site, or a hybrid site with a more open ended structure. I can&#39;t really use one tool in place of the other. I use both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamesisatool</title>
		<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamesisatool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamespoling.com/?p=1878#comment-268</guid>
		<description>James, you are a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you are a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamespoling.com/?p=1878#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your feedback.  Actually I specifically mention the Movable Type Open Source Project launched in 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While this may not be a completely favorable post about Movable Type, I really say nothing horrendous about Six Apart as a company.  There are many opinions in the post, all of them based on many years of experience in blogging and social media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The post is about my experiences and many people I&#039;ve known in the blogging community.  When I was writing this post I wasn&#039;t twirling my handlebar mustache and laughing diabolically while petting a cat.  In fact it was just the opposite.  It was, for me, a look back at what might have been.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My first &quot;blog&quot; was hand coded html.  From there I graduated to Blogger.  I outgrew Blogger and moved to TypePad.  I wanted more control and flexibility so I moved to Movable Type.  I have extremely fond memories of hacking into Movable Type and I&#039;m extremely aware of the opportunities it provided me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I stuck with Movable Type long after the pricing fiasco.  I actually never berated them back then for it (that I can remember at least).  I thought the community sentiment was a bit over-reactionary and I was always aware of the free single-user license, which is what I used so I never understood the big deal.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does that change any of the things I said? No, I still believe everything I said and I also believe that it is a fairly accurate retelling of the events that I believe ultimately led to WordPress being a dominant publishing platform for exactly the reasons I mentioned.  It&#039;s always been free on every level, it&#039;s always been Open Source, it uses far less user resources and it&#039;s backend is much faster. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not as if I wrote this out of the blue to somehow cast aspersions on Movable Type.  It was, I felt directly related to the announcement on Saturday so, I wrote it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your feedback.  Actually I specifically mention the Movable Type Open Source Project launched in 2007.</p>
<p>While this may not be a completely favorable post about Movable Type, I really say nothing horrendous about Six Apart as a company.  There are many opinions in the post, all of them based on many years of experience in blogging and social media.</p>
<p>The post is about my experiences and many people I&#39;ve known in the blogging community.  When I was writing this post I wasn&#39;t twirling my handlebar mustache and laughing diabolically while petting a cat.  In fact it was just the opposite.  It was, for me, a look back at what might have been.  </p>
<p>My first &#8220;blog&#8221; was hand coded html.  From there I graduated to Blogger.  I outgrew Blogger and moved to TypePad.  I wanted more control and flexibility so I moved to Movable Type.  I have extremely fond memories of hacking into Movable Type and I&#39;m extremely aware of the opportunities it provided me.</p>
<p>I stuck with Movable Type long after the pricing fiasco.  I actually never berated them back then for it (that I can remember at least).  I thought the community sentiment was a bit over-reactionary and I was always aware of the free single-user license, which is what I used so I never understood the big deal.  </p>
<p>Does that change any of the things I said? No, I still believe everything I said and I also believe that it is a fairly accurate retelling of the events that I believe ultimately led to WordPress being a dominant publishing platform for exactly the reasons I mentioned.  It&#39;s always been free on every level, it&#39;s always been Open Source, it uses far less user resources and it&#39;s backend is much faster. </p>
<p>It&#39;s not as if I wrote this out of the blue to somehow cast aspersions on Movable Type.  It was, I felt directly related to the announcement on Saturday so, I wrote it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamespoling.com/?p=1878#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your feedback.  Actually I specifically mention the Movable Type Open Source Project launched in 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While this may not be a &quot;favorable&quot; post about Movable Type, I really say nothing horrendous about Six Apart as a company.  There are many opinions in the post, all of them based on many years of experience in blogging and social media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The post is about my experiences as well as the experiences of many people I&#039;ve known in the blogging community.  When I was writing this post I wasn&#039;t twirling my handlebar mustache and laughing diabolically while petting a cat.  In fact it was just the opposite.  It was, for me, a look back at what might have been.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My first &quot;blog&quot; was hand coded html.  From there I graduated to Blogger.  I outgrew Blogger and moved to TypePad.  I wanted more control and flexibility so I moved to Movable Type.  I have extremely fond memories of hacking into Movable Type and I&#039;m extremely aware of the opportunities it provided me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anything I was a late adopter to WordPress.  As a matter of fact, I used Movable Type up until early 2006.  I actually just found a post from 2006 that mentioned the issues I was having setting up MT on GoDaddy (when I was moving from TypePad) and I don&#039;t say one bad thing about MT, in fact I told MT users to beware of GoDaddy at the time.  The problem was that it came to a point where I was getting enough traffic that my hosting bills were outrageous.  I actually moved a dedicated server and still had issues.  The bottom line was I literally couldn&#039;t afford to use Movable Type anymore.  I found when I switched to WordPress that with the same amount of traffic and pageviews I was using about a quarter of the resources and that the community developing plugins and themes around WordPress was far more vibrant and dynamic than I was used to. It has also been my experience that my relationship with MT was not unique.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I stuck with Movable Type long after the pricing fiasco.  I actually never berated them back then for it (that I can remember at least).  I thought the community sentiment was a bit over-reactionary and I was always aware of the free single-user license, which is what I used so I never understood the big deal.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does that change any of the things I said? No, I still stand by everything I said and I also believe that it is a fairly accurate retelling of the events that I believe ultimately led to WordPress being a dominant publishing platform for exactly the reasons I mentioned.  It&#039;s always been free on every level, it&#039;s always been Open Source, it uses far less user resources and it&#039;s backend is much faster. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not as if I wrote this out of the blue to somehow cast aspersions on Movable Type.  It was, I felt directly related to the announcement on Saturday so, I wrote it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I very much appreciate your point of view and thank you for sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your feedback.  Actually I specifically mention the Movable Type Open Source Project launched in 2007.</p>
<p>While this may not be a &#8220;favorable&#8221; post about Movable Type, I really say nothing horrendous about Six Apart as a company.  There are many opinions in the post, all of them based on many years of experience in blogging and social media.</p>
<p>The post is about my experiences as well as the experiences of many people I&#39;ve known in the blogging community.  When I was writing this post I wasn&#39;t twirling my handlebar mustache and laughing diabolically while petting a cat.  In fact it was just the opposite.  It was, for me, a look back at what might have been.  </p>
<p>My first &#8220;blog&#8221; was hand coded html.  From there I graduated to Blogger.  I outgrew Blogger and moved to TypePad.  I wanted more control and flexibility so I moved to Movable Type.  I have extremely fond memories of hacking into Movable Type and I&#39;m extremely aware of the opportunities it provided me.</p>
<p>If anything I was a late adopter to WordPress.  As a matter of fact, I used Movable Type up until early 2006.  I actually just found a post from 2006 that mentioned the issues I was having setting up MT on GoDaddy (when I was moving from TypePad) and I don&#39;t say one bad thing about MT, in fact I told MT users to beware of GoDaddy at the time.  The problem was that it came to a point where I was getting enough traffic that my hosting bills were outrageous.  I actually moved a dedicated server and still had issues.  The bottom line was I literally couldn&#39;t afford to use Movable Type anymore.  I found when I switched to WordPress that with the same amount of traffic and pageviews I was using about a quarter of the resources and that the community developing plugins and themes around WordPress was far more vibrant and dynamic than I was used to. It has also been my experience that my relationship with MT was not unique.</p>
<p>I stuck with Movable Type long after the pricing fiasco.  I actually never berated them back then for it (that I can remember at least).  I thought the community sentiment was a bit over-reactionary and I was always aware of the free single-user license, which is what I used so I never understood the big deal.  </p>
<p>Does that change any of the things I said? No, I still stand by everything I said and I also believe that it is a fairly accurate retelling of the events that I believe ultimately led to WordPress being a dominant publishing platform for exactly the reasons I mentioned.  It&#39;s always been free on every level, it&#39;s always been Open Source, it uses far less user resources and it&#39;s backend is much faster. </p>
<p>It&#39;s not as if I wrote this out of the blue to somehow cast aspersions on Movable Type.  It was, I felt directly related to the announcement on Saturday so, I wrote it.</p>
<p>I very much appreciate your point of view and thank you for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salguod</title>
		<link>http://jamespoling.com/the-inglorious-rise-and-fall-of-six-apart-now-making-products-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>salguod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamespoling.com/?p=1878#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I didn&#039;t mean that as a reply to your comment. Must have hit the wrong button, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I didn&#39;t mean that as a reply to your comment. Must have hit the wrong button, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
